Why or How Should Singlish Be Preserved?
What is “Singlish”? It means “Singapore English” and has different grammar, vocabulary or pronunciation and is used in informal situations. There is also English called Singapore Standard English(SSE) and it is used in formal situations. Singapore is the multi-ethnic society mainly by Chinese, Malay and Indian and each build community. English is one of the official languages and the administrative language. “Although most Singaporeans usually use Singlish, the Singapore government sees the use of Singlish as a serious problem to deal with”(Shinichi 71). According to Yeo, Tersa Rebecca in “Singlish” on SINGAPORE PAGES/Singapore Infopedia, to encourage standard English for Singporeans, the government started "Speak Good English Movement" in 2001(Teresa). For the government, Singlish is an obstacle and want to make it disappear and want people to use standard English only but Singlish is widely spread. The government and peopel need to know why Singlish should be preserved. Also, to keep the balance between use of Singlish and that of standard English, the government should encourage schools to teach standard English for communication with people in the world. At the same time, the government should preserve Singlish as culture.
Firstly, Singlish should be preserved because some people cherish it and feel that they need it. According to Harada Shinichi in his 2009 report “The Roles of Singapore Standard English and Singlish”, the government has started to abolish Singlish but many Singaporean keep using it as their identity(Shinichi 69). Anasuya Balamurugan, whose post is Senior Research Associate 1 in National Industry Board, says “Speak Good English campaign firstly started in 2000 and the purpose of the government is to encourage standard English and discourage Singlish” (Anasuya). It means that the government is trying to make Singlish disappear though there are still people who likes Singlish and keep using it. Unless there are those people, the government should not eradicate it because Singlish is their precious language and the government does not have the right to derive it. According to Rani Rubdy , who is at the National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, in “Journal of Multiligual and Multicultural Development”, there are negative comments to Singlish but some says Singlish is a cool, funny and relaxed language.“ ‘Without Singlish, life will be pretty boring’ ‘Senior citizens will be confused without Singlish’ ”(Rani 310) These opinions show that there are people who think Singlish as a unique culture or an useful language. Thus, Singlish is needed by people and needed to be cherished.
Secondly, Singlish should not be disappeared because language is an important culture and languages’ disappearance is dangerous. According to Nora C. England, who is a doctor of philosophy at University of Florida, in her 1992 book “Endangered Languages”, language plays an important role in people’s identity, culture and society. “Local communities who have lost their language speak about it as a deeply personal loss which is accompanied by a loss of a sense of self”(Nora 140). If language disappear, people can lose their identity because language is strongly related to culture or it is culture itself. For example, the word “lah” is a famous and original Singlish word and the nuance are different in some kinds of sentences. Thus, those words are important to change the atmosphere of sentences. Also, in the future, if children can speak only standard English though there are older people who can speak only Singlish, those people can not communicate with each other. Singapore is the multi-ethnic society and need a language to communicate so if it loses Singlish and makes a barrier between older generation and younger one, they can not live well together. Culture should be passes down to generation to generation so Singlish, which was made by older generation should be took over. Therefore, it is necessary to preserve Singlish as a factor of culture.
Thirdly, the standard English also should be taught because it is needed when Singaporeans communicate with people from other countries. Tersa Rebecca Yeo argues that In Singpore, English was not common and there were few people who mastered it. After Singpore got independence in 1965, the government started to encourage English for economic because Singpore does not have natural resources(Teresa). English is a necessary and important tool for Singapore to survive. In the globalizing world and under the situation without natural resources, Singapore should state that English is a strong weapon. From those reasons, standard English, which is worldwide used needs to be encouraged for the future of Singapore. In addition, the very important industry in Singapore is sightseeing so the relation between Singapore and other countries is strong. People who belong to sightseeing industry need to speak standard English for tourists. To keep sightseeing industry well, Singapore should make tourists feel like returning to Singapore again by giving them good impression with standard English. Therefore, Singaporean should learn Singlish for the future.Finally, the government should make some solutions to save Singlish and encourage standard English at the same time. The problem is mainly how the government preserve Singlish. This is because the government now tries to encourage only standard English so Singlish will be disappear someday at this rate. For example, one way to encourage Singlish is to start “Speak-Singlish campaign” opposed to “Speak Good English campaign”. It should be focused on the conversation in daily life and some TV programs in Singlish can be broadcasted. Teresa Rebecca Yeo says that the supporters of Singlish mainly argue that it removes racial differences so “Singlish is an essential part of local culture and heritage”(Teresa). It shows that Singlish is an important communication tool in multi-ethnic society and it is needed in their lives for social harmony.From that point, in the campaign, the interchange among different communities should be also encouraged by Singlish. Thus, the government need to keep action to encourage both standard English and Singish.
Therefore, the government should save Singlish and encourage standard English for Singaporeans by good action. The job of the government is not only to make people adapt to worldwide criteria but also to preserve its own culture. People’s feeling toward languages or culture should be cherished and it is important to think the importance or history of their culture again. In such a globalizing world, however, it might be impossible or it is difficult to keep all cultures because each country can not avoid to compete with other countries.
Works Cited
Balamurugan, Anasuya. "First Speak Good English Campaign." Infopedia - National Library Board, Singapore. N.p., n.d. Web. 15 Oct. 2011.
<http://infopedia.nl.sg/articles/SIP_575_2004-12-23.html>.
England Nora C. Endangered Languages. Texas, Elsevier Ltd. 2006. Print.
Harada, Shinichi. The Roles of Singapore Standard English and Singlish. Bunkyo University, n.d. Web. 15 Oct. 2011. <http://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/110006994449>.
Rubdy, Rani. "Singlish in the School: An Impediment or a Resource." Journal of Multiligual
and Multicultural Development 28.4 (2007): 310. Taylor Francis Online. Web. 11 Oct. 2011.
Yen, Teresa Rebecca. "Singlish." Infopedia - National Library Board, Singapore. N.p., n.d.
Web. 15 Oct. 2011. <http://infopedia.nl.sg/articles/SIP_1745_2010-12-29.html>.
Nice draft, Ayako!
返信削除Your introduction and thesis seem mostly very well-written and clear, but the last sentence of the thesis seems to need some reasons or main supporting points.
the government should preserve Singlish as culture BECAUSE...
Your two points about "people cherish it" and "it is valuable culture" are both quite well-argued. Nice use of sources and ICE! I have just some small comments on those I can give you in tutorial if you like.
The third and fourth body paragraphs are a little bit less smooth. Arguing that Standard English should also be taught seems a little bit off the topic...I think the main focus should be your point about how to preserve Singlish more effectively. You have many good ideas in that part.
In the conclusion, you seem to need to re-state your main points a little more accurately and completely.
Nice writing so far!